Nemo me impune lacessit *
From the Romans to the Normans
After the Romans left, Britain became a vacuum that sucked in the surrounding barbarians that long had
lusted after the wealth of the island. The Picts lacked the numbers and the inclination to expand their
lands but the Scots, Angles, Saxons and Jutes were only too ready to join in and seize the opportunity.
From the east and south coasts of England, the Anglo-Saxons spread west and north. From the mid 400’s
they slowly advanced and forced the Britons into ever decreasing enclaves centred on Cornwall, Wales
and Cumbria. Many sought escape to Britany but most were absorbed into the new society.
The northern tribes, also received their share of refugees and by the 600’s the Britons in the north
had accumulated into two groups, the Gododdin in the Lothians and the Cumbrians, a loose group of petty
kingdoms stretching from the Clyde to the English Lake District. Pressing these remaining British tribes
hard from the southeast were the Angles.
Meanwhile across the Irish sea, the Scots of
Dal Riata had long established connections with
the Western Islands and west coast of Scotland.
The natural trade routes and migration paths
were by sea as any glance at a map will tell us
(even today travel by land is circuitous and
difficult). In all probability the Scots were well
established before 500 when Fergus Mor mac Eirc
reputedly led his people to cross to Argyll in
strength. The reality may be that he merely
changed his seat of power to a more central and
secure location; Ireland itself was the scene of
constant power struggles and war.
The balance of power gradually shifted over the next few
centuries. By the mid 600s the Angles had supplanted the
Gododdin and were firmly entrenched in the Lothians as
part of Northumbria. As fortunes turned and the power
of the varying component parts of the land waxed and
waned, the next few centuries was a period of warfare
and struggle for survival. To add further to the mix, by
the late 700s the Vikings began to raid and colonise the
Hebrides and the north and west of the mainland,
intermarrying with the native Scots and Picts. The Angles too had their troubles with the Danes and
control over Northumbria switched back and forth between Danish and Anglo-Saxon rulers.
What finally broke the stalemate was the ascension of the Scots over the Picts. How this came about
cannot be said with any certainty but most accept that the king of the Scoti, Kenneth mac Alpin took
the Pictish throne about 840 as the son of a Pictish princess ( the Picts were a matrilineal society).
Once Scoti ascendancy was entrenched, Pictish society gave way to Scottish to such an extent that
within a century few vestiges of it remained.
The welding of the two most northern Celtic nations, despite the depredations of the Vikings, gave the
impetus to the conquest of the Lothians and the absorbing of the British kingdom of Strathclyde and
Galloway. By 1018, after the victory over the Angles of Northumbria at Carham, the Scots had establish
their borders much as they are today. All that remained was to take back Caithness and Sutherland
and the northern and western islands from the Vikings and, of course, prevent the English from taking
Scotland for its own.
By the time of the Norman conquest of England, Scotland was finally becoming a nation. However it
wasn’t a nation of one single people, with one single outlook and one single set of values. It was a mixture
of Celtic and Germanic nations and even the Celtic portions spoke different languages. What did bring
them together was the Christian religion and the struggle against their common enemies, the Vikings
and the English.
Like the morning mist in the Highlands
that obscures the view of the castle
on Loch an Eilean, the picture that
comes to us from those days is faint
and insubstantial. There is something
there to see but we cannot make out
the details.
We do have contemporary accounts,
notably from theViking sagas and the
Anglo-Saxon Chronicles, but those
accounts are coloured by their own
viewpoints. From Scottish sources
the best of the early records, the
Scotichronicon was written three hundred years after the end of that age. That work was a compilation
of local traditions and legends and no doubt had a kernel of truth but people tend to remember what
they want to remember.
Often the accounts we do read tend to add confusion with contradictory and incomplete stories. A good
example of this is Macbeth. Reading the Orkneyinga Saga, we could wonder if Thorfinn the Mighty
might not be another name for the
Macbeth we know of from the Scottish
histories. Thorfinn we are told
defeated Karl Hundason, king of the
Scots on the very same day, the Feast
of the Assumption in 1040, that
Macbeth defeated King Duncan. Not
only that but both apparently went
on pilgrimage to Rome in 1050. Then to
confuse things further, we have
Shakespeare’s play, based on
Holinshed’s chronicles, which were
heavily slanted by later dynastic (i.e.
political) considerations.
Unlike the view of Loch an Eilean
which is revealed in its full splendour
when the sun disperses the morning mist, the mists of history continue to hide more than they reveal.
We are left with our imagination to fill in the gaps.
To Return to the Main Scotland Page
To Return to my Home Page